Software · head to head
Auphonic vs Squadcast
The short version
- Only Auphonic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auphonic the free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month; Squadcast free plan limited to 1 recording hour per editor per month and exports capped at 720p with watermarks
- They diverge on capability: Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Squadcast covers Local recording.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auphonic and Squadcast actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auphonic
- Automatic loudness optimization
- Noise reduction
- Audio restoration
- Intelligent processing
- API integration
- Auto-upload
- Podcast hosts
- FTP
Only in Squadcast
- Local recording
- Progressive upload
- Video recording
- Screen sharing
- Dolby audio
- Cloud storage
- Descript
- Zoom
Both cover
- Dropbox
- Google Drive
- Data protection
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auphonic
- Automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audionot Squadcast
- Batch processing an archive of recordingsnot Squadcast
- Generating transcripts and chapters from an episodenot Squadcast
- Producing consistent output across multiple formats from one uploadnot Squadcast
Squadcast
- Remote podcast recording with per-editor hour-based billingnot Auphonic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auphonic
- The free tier covers 2 hours of processed audio a month
- Billing is by audio duration with a 3 minute minimum per production, so many short clips cost more than the running time suggests
- Multilingual speech recognition, automatic chapters and show notes all require a paid plan
- Watch folders, batch productions and team accounts are paid features
- Free output carries an Auphonic jingle
Squadcast
- Free plan limited to 1 recording hour per editor per month and exports capped at 720p with watermarks
- Hobbyist plan monthly price of $24 per person rises to $35 per person if paid monthly instead of annually
- Recording hour rollover is capped at twice the plan's monthly hour allotment
Pricing, plan by plan
Auphonic
Free- FreeFree
- 2 hours/month processing
- Basic mastering
- Download files
- Personal$10/month
- 50 hours/month
- Advanced mastering
- API access
Squadcast
$12/month- Indie$12/month
- 5 hours recording
- Audio only
- Up to 3 guests
- Creator$20/month
- 10 hours recording
- Audio + Video
- Up to 5 guests
- Studio$44/month
- 25 hours recording
- All features
- Up to 9 guests
Which should you pick?
Choose Auphonic if
- You need automatic loudness optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want noise reduction.
Choose Squadcast if
- You need local recording.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want progressive upload.
Questions people ask
- Is Auphonic or Squadcast better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auphonic starts at Free and Squadcast at $12/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auphonic or Squadcast?
- Auphonic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Auphonic and $12/month for Squadcast.
- Does Auphonic or Squadcast run on more platforms?
- Auphonic runs on Web. Squadcast runs on Web, Desktop.
- Can I use Auphonic for free?
- Yes. Auphonic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Squadcast starts at $12/month.
- What is Auphonic best used for?
- Auphonic is most often used for automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audio, batch processing an archive of recordings, generating transcripts and chapters from an episode, producing consistent output across multiple formats from one upload. Of those, automatic loudness levelling and noise reduction on podcast audio and batch processing an archive of recordings are not what Squadcast is typically brought in for.
- What can Auphonic do that Squadcast cannot?
- Auphonic covers Automatic loudness optimization, Noise reduction, Audio restoration, Intelligent processing. Squadcast covers Local recording, Progressive upload, Video recording, Screen sharing. Both handle Dropbox, Google Drive, Data protection, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Auphonic vs Pocketcasts
- Auphonic vs Buzzsprout
- Auphonic vs Transistor.fm
- Auphonic vs Adobe Podcast
- Auphonic vs Apple Podcasts Connect
- Auphonic vs Libsyn
- Auphonic vs Patreon
- Auphonic vs Podbean
- Auphonic vs Transistor
- Auphonic vs Acast
- Auphonic vs Alitu
- Auphonic vs Audioboom
- Auphonic vs Blubrry
- Auphonic vs Captivate
- Auphonic vs Castmagic
- Auphonic vs Castos
- Auphonic vs Chartable
- Auphonic vs Cleanfeed
- Auphonic vs Synthesia
- Auphonic vs Anchor
- Auphonic vs Riverside.fm
- Auphonic vs Adobe Audition
- Auphonic vs Camtasia
- Auphonic vs CapCut
- Auphonic vs Descript
- Auphonic vs Filmora
- Auphonic vs OpusClip
- Auphonic vs Wistia
- Squadcast vs Pocketcasts
- Squadcast vs Buzzsprout
- Squadcast vs Transistor.fm
- Squadcast vs Adobe Podcast
- Squadcast vs Apple Podcasts Connect
- Squadcast vs Libsyn
- Squadcast vs Patreon
- Squadcast vs Podbean
- Squadcast vs Transistor
- Squadcast vs Acast
- Squadcast vs Alitu
- Squadcast vs Audioboom
- Squadcast vs Blubrry
- Squadcast vs Captivate
- Squadcast vs Castmagic
- Squadcast vs Castos
- Squadcast vs Chartable
- Squadcast vs Cleanfeed
- Squadcast vs Synthesia
- Squadcast vs Anchor
- Squadcast vs Riverside.fm
- Squadcast vs Adobe Audition
- Squadcast vs Camtasia
- Squadcast vs CapCut
- Squadcast vs Descript
- Squadcast vs Filmora
- Squadcast vs OpusClip
- Squadcast vs Wistia


