Database & Data Management · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Amazon Aurora
Database & Data Management
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Security & Cybersecurity
Enterprise endpoint security built into Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Amazon Aurora has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Database & Data Management | Security & Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2006 | 1975 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Threat & vulnerability management
- Attack surface reduction
- Next-gen protection
- EDR
- Auto investigation
- Microsoft Threat Experts
- Threat analytics
- Secure score
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Data storagenot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Application backendnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Reportingnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Data analyticsnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Enterprise endpoint security across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS via Plans 1 or 2not Amazon Aurora
- Small and medium-sized businesses using Microsoft Defender for Business as alternativenot Amazon Aurora
- Organisations using Microsoft 365 E5 which includes Defender for Endpoint Plan 2not Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 do not include server licenses; additional licensing required for server protection
- Specific feature differences between Plan 1 and Plan 2 require consulting Microsoft documentation
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if
- You need threat & vulnerability management.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want attack surface reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
- Amazon Aurora has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Amazon Aurora and On request for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
- Does Amazon Aurora or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Yes. Amazon Aurora has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint starts at On request.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, Attack surface reduction, Next-gen protection, EDR.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
More on Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs 1Password
- Amazon Aurora vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Amazon Aurora vs Norton 360
- Amazon Aurora vs LastPass
- Amazon Aurora vs Bitwarden
- Amazon Aurora vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Amazon Aurora vs McAfee Total Protection
- Amazon Aurora vs Avast One
- Amazon Aurora vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Amazon Aurora vs CyberGhost VPN
- Amazon Aurora vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Amazon Aurora vs ExpressVPN
- Amazon Aurora vs Malwarebytes
- Amazon Aurora vs NordVPN
- Amazon Aurora vs ProtonVPN
- Amazon Aurora vs Snyk
- Amazon Aurora vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Amazon Aurora vs Acunetix
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cockroach Labs
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs PostgreSQL
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Airtable
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elasticsearch
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs PlanetScale
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Azure SQL
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ClickHouse
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Couchbase
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DuckDB
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DynamoDB
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs MariaDB
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Oracle Database
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Amazon RDS
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Amazon Redshift
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Apache Druid
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cassandra
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CouchDB
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Firebolt
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs 1Password
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs LastPass
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitwarden
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs McAfee Total Protection
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Avast One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberGhost VPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ExpressVPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs NordVPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ProtonVPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Snyk
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Acunetix
