Softwr

Software · head to head

Agronomic vs OpenWeatherMap

A

Agronomic

Software

Data-driven nutrient management

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
OpenWeatherMap logo

OpenWeatherMap

Software

Developer-friendly weather API with global coverage

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Agronomic add-on only to FieldAlytics, not a standalone product; OpenWeatherMap free tier capped at 60 calls/minute and 1,000,000 calls/month
  • They diverge on capability: Agronomic covers Soil analysis, OpenWeatherMap covers Weather API.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Agronomic and OpenWeatherMap actually diverge.

Attributes where Agronomic and OpenWeatherMap differ
AttributeAgronomicOpenWeatherMap
Pricing modelsubscriptionUnknown
PlatformsWeb, MobileWeb
Founded20132017

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Agronomic

  • Soil analysis
  • Nutrient recommendations
  • Variable rate maps
  • Tissue testing
  • Fertility planning
  • Climate FieldView
  • John Deere
  • Ag Leader

Only in OpenWeatherMap

  • Weather API
  • Current conditions
  • Forecasts
  • Historical data
  • Weather maps
  • REST API
  • JSON format
  • Widgets

Both cover

  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Agronomic

  • Soil samplingnot OpenWeatherMap
  • Nutrient planningnot OpenWeatherMap
  • Variable rate fertilizernot OpenWeatherMap
  • Crop consultingnot OpenWeatherMap

OpenWeatherMap

  • Embedding current weather and short-term forecasts into third-party apps/websitesnot Agronomic
  • Pulling historical and statistical weather data for researchnot Agronomic
  • Displaying weather map overlays (precipitation, clouds, etc.) via the Weather Maps APInot Agronomic
  • Monitoring air pollution levels via the Air Pollution APInot Agronomic
  • Geocoding locations for weather lookupsnot Agronomic

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Agronomic

  • Add-on only to FieldAlytics, not a standalone product
  • Pricing requires sales contact, not transparently published
  • Takes 3-4 days to reflect rainfall impacts in recommendations
  • No direct competitor to Climate FieldView's broader analytics capabilities

OpenWeatherMap

  • Free tier capped at 60 calls/minute and 1,000,000 calls/month
  • Free tier limited to current weather, 3-hour/5-day forecast, air pollution, 15 map layers, and geocoding only
  • One Call API free allowance is only 1,000 calls/day before pay-per-call charges apply
  • Paid tier (Startup, Developer, Professional, Expert) exact USD prices are not published on the public pricing page

Pricing, plan by plan

Agronomic

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Basic soil analysis
    • Weather data
    • Limited recommendations
  • Professional$89/month
    • Advanced soil testing
    • Nutrient management
    • Prescription maps
  • Consultant$199/month
    • Multi-client management
    • White-label reports
    • API access

OpenWeatherMap

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 60 calls/min
    • 1,000,000 calls/month
    • current weather, 3-hr/5-day forecast, air pollution, 15 map layers, geocoding

Which should you pick?

Choose Agronomic if

  • You need soil analysis.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Mobile.
  • You also want nutrient recommendations.
Agronomic review

Choose OpenWeatherMap if

  • You need weather api.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want current conditions.
OpenWeatherMap review

Questions people ask

Is Agronomic or OpenWeatherMap better?
Neither clearly leads. Agronomic starts at Free and OpenWeatherMap at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Agronomic or OpenWeatherMap?
Agronomic starts at Free and OpenWeatherMap at Free.
Does Agronomic or OpenWeatherMap run on more platforms?
Agronomic runs on Web, Mobile. OpenWeatherMap runs on Web.
Can I use Agronomic for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Agronomic best used for?
Agronomic is most often used for soil sampling, nutrient planning, variable rate fertilizer, crop consulting. Of those, soil sampling and nutrient planning are not what OpenWeatherMap is typically brought in for.
What can Agronomic do that OpenWeatherMap cannot?
Agronomic covers Soil analysis, Nutrient recommendations, Variable rate maps, Tissue testing. OpenWeatherMap covers Weather API, Current conditions, Forecasts, Historical data. Both handle Web support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Agronomic: How does Adapt-N generate nitrogen recommendations?

Adapt-N uses 13 interconnected models that process soil characteristics, crop history, real-time weather data, manure applications, and irrigation information to generate field-specific nitrogen recommendations. It requires a minimum of 7 core data inputs, though spatial data significantly improves accuracy.

Source
Agronomic: Where is Adapt-N available?

Adapt-N is available across the lower 48 U.S. states and six Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec.

Source
Agronomic: Is Adapt-N a standalone product or add-on?

Adapt-N is an optional paid add-on service for FieldAlytics users. It is not available as a standalone product; farmers must use it through the FieldAlytics platform via Ever.Ag.

Source
Agronomic: How long does Adapt-N take to reflect weather changes?

Adapt-N takes 3 to 4 days after rainfall events to fully reflect environmental impacts in its nitrogen recommendations.

Source
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Agronomic

More on OpenWeatherMap

Keep looking

Other head to heads