Backup & Disaster Recovery · head to head
Restic vs Borg Backup

Restic
Backup & Disaster Recovery
Fast, secure, and efficient backup program
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Borg Backup
Backup & Disaster Recovery
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Restic cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag; Borg Backup linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
- They diverge on capability: Restic covers Cryptographic verification, Borg Backup covers Compression.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Restic and Borg Backup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Restic | Borg Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Linux | Linux, Mac |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup & Disaster Recovery).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Restic
- Cryptographic verification
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
- Snapshot management
- AWS S3
- Azure
- Google Cloud
- Backblaze B2
Only in Borg Backup
- Compression
- Authenticated encryption
- Pruning
- Mount archives
- SSH
- BorgBase
- rsync.net
- Hetzner Storage Box
Both cover
- Content-defined chunking
- Deduplication
- Mac support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Restic
- Encrypted deduplicated backups to S3, B2, SFTP and local disk from the command linenot Borg Backup
- Scripted server backups with snapshot retention policiesnot Borg Backup
Borg Backup
- Deduplicated backups where daily full snapshots would otherwise be expensivenot Restic
- Encrypted backup to a server you do not fully trust, since the server never sees plaintextnot Restic
- Browsing previous versions by mounting an archive over FUSEnot Restic
- Scripted server backups with no agent or daemon to runnot Restic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Restic
- Cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag
- A Windows file whose name contains a character Windows treats as invalid cannot be read by restic and has to be renamed
- Antivirus real-time protection degrades performance on Windows unless the restic binary is added to an exclusions list
- On large repositories the built-in five minute stuck-request timeout fires during file listing and has to be raised manually with --stuck-request-timeout
Borg Backup
- Linux, macOS and BSD only; Windows is not a supported platform
- Command-line only, with no graphical interface in the project itself
- Version 2.0 is still in beta, so production use means staying on the 1.4 line
- Restoring requires the Borg tooling, since archives are a deduplicated chunk store rather than plain files
Pricing, plan by plan
Restic
Free- FreeFree
- Content-defined chunking
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
Borg Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Deduplication
- Compression
- Encryption
Which should you pick?
Choose Restic if
- You need cryptographic verification.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux.
- You also want encryption.
Choose Borg Backup if
- You need compression.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac.
- You also want authenticated encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Restic or Borg Backup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Restic starts at Free and Borg Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Restic or Borg Backup?
- Restic starts at Free and Borg Backup at Free.
- Does Restic or Borg Backup run on more platforms?
- Restic runs on Windows, Mac, Linux. Borg Backup runs on Linux, Mac.
- Can I use Restic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Restic best used for?
- Restic is most often used for encrypted deduplicated backups to s3, b2, sftp and local disk from the command line, scripted server backups with snapshot retention policies. Of those, encrypted deduplicated backups to s3, b2, sftp and local disk from the command line and scripted server backups with snapshot retention policies are not what Borg Backup is typically brought in for.
- What can Restic do that Borg Backup cannot?
- Restic covers Cryptographic verification, Encryption, Multiple backends, Snapshot management. Borg Backup covers Compression, Authenticated encryption, Pruning, Mount archives. Both handle Content-defined chunking, Deduplication, Mac support, Linux support.
Related pages
More on Borg Backup
Other head to heads
- Restic vs Backupify
- Restic vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Restic vs CloudAlly
- Restic vs Spanning Backup
- Restic vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Restic vs Datto SIRIS
- Restic vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Restic vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Restic vs Comet Backup
- Restic vs Duplicacy
- Restic vs Keepit
- Restic vs Rewind
- Restic vs Altaro VM Backup
- Restic vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Restic vs HPE StoreOnce
- Restic vs MSP360 Backup
- Restic vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Restic vs OwnBackup
- Borg Backup vs Backupify
- Borg Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Borg Backup vs CloudAlly
- Borg Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Borg Backup vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Borg Backup vs Datto SIRIS
- Borg Backup vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Borg Backup vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Borg Backup vs Comet Backup
- Borg Backup vs Duplicacy
- Borg Backup vs Keepit
- Borg Backup vs Rewind
- Borg Backup vs Altaro VM Backup
- Borg Backup vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Borg Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Borg Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Borg Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Borg Backup vs OwnBackup
