Software · head to head
Pix4Dfields vs Arable
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Pix4Dfields satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year; Arable requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription
- They diverge on capability: Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, Arable covers Weather monitoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pix4Dfields and Arable actually diverge.
| Attribute | Pix4Dfields | Arable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $330/month | $29/month |
| Platforms | Windows, Ios | Web, Ios, Android, Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pix4Dfields
- Orthomosaic generation
- NDVI & vegetation indices
- Multispectral processing
- Zonation mapping
- Prescription maps
- Stand count
- Export to machinery
- Offline processing
Only in Arable
- Weather monitoring
- Evapotranspiration
- Chlorophyll index
- Disease risk models
- Growth stage tracking
- Climate FieldView
- GDPR
- Web support
Both cover
- John Deere
- Trimble
- SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pix4Dfields
- Processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limitsnot Arable
- Generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveysnot Arable
- Producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinerynot Arable
- Agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flightsnot Arable
Arable
- In-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensornot Pix4Dfields
- Irrigation scheduling based on measured conditionsnot Pix4Dfields
- Water sustainability reporting for enterprise growersnot Pix4Dfields
- Weather risk management across dispersed fieldsnot Pix4Dfields
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pix4Dfields
- Satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- Monthly billing is listed at $165.83 per month against $1,990 for a year, so paying monthly costs substantially more
- The software runs only on Windows and macOS, with no Linux build
Arable
- Requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription
- Pricing is not published and goes through a sales conversation
- Aimed at enterprise growers and advisors rather than smallholders
Pricing, plan by plan
Pix4Dfields
$330/month- Monthly$330/month
- RGB & multispectral processing
- Vegetation indices
- Zonation maps
- Annual$2640/year
- Everything in Monthly
- 33% savings
- Priority support
- Perpetual$5500/one-time
- Lifetime license
- 1 year updates
- Local processing
Arable
$29/month- Standard$1200/device/year
- Weather data
- Crop stress
- Basic analytics
- Premium$2400/device/year
- Full analytics
- Disease models
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Pix4Dfields if
- You need orthomosaic generation.
- You work on Windows, Ios.
- You also want ndvi & vegetation indices.
Choose Arable if
- You need weather monitoring.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want evapotranspiration.
Questions people ask
- Is Pix4Dfields or Arable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and Arable at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pix4Dfields or Arable?
- Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and Arable at $29/month.
- Does Pix4Dfields or Arable run on more platforms?
- Pix4Dfields runs on Windows, Ios. Arable runs on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- What is Pix4Dfields best used for?
- Pix4Dfields is most often used for processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits, generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys, producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinery, agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flights. Of those, processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits and generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys are not what Arable is typically brought in for.
- What can Pix4Dfields do that Arable cannot?
- Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, NDVI & vegetation indices, Multispectral processing, Zonation mapping. Arable covers Weather monitoring, Evapotranspiration, Chlorophyll index, Disease risk models. Both handle John Deere, Trimble, SSL.
Related pages
More on Pix4Dfields
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Pix4Dfields vs CropX
- Pix4Dfields vs Granular
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriSync
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel
- Pix4Dfields vs Conservis
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmLogs
- Pix4Dfields vs MyJohnDeere
- Pix4Dfields vs 365FarmNet
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag-Analytics
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag Leader
- Pix4Dfields vs AgCode
- Pix4Dfields vs Agrivi
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWater
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWebb
- Pix4Dfields vs Agronomic
- Pix4Dfields vs Agworld
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel Farm
- Pix4Dfields vs CattleMax
- Arable vs CropX
- Arable vs Granular
- Arable vs AgriSync
- Arable vs Bushel
- Arable vs Conservis
- Arable vs FarmLogs
- Arable vs MyJohnDeere
- Arable vs 365FarmNet
- Arable vs Ag-Analytics
- Arable vs Ag Leader
- Arable vs AgCode
- Arable vs Agrivi
- Arable vs AgriWater
- Arable vs AgriWebb
- Arable vs Agronomic
- Arable vs Agworld
- Arable vs Bushel Farm
- Arable vs CattleMax


