Softwr

Spreadsheet & Data · head to head

NocoDB vs Snowflake

NocoDB logo

NocoDB

Spreadsheet & Data

Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Snowflake logo

Snowflake

Machine Learning & Data Science

The AI Data Cloud for enterprise data warehousing

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage; Snowflake no flat subscription price is published - cost varies by edition, cloud provider, and region and requires a separate calculator or credit-consumption table
  • They diverge on capability: NocoDB covers REST API, Snowflake covers Separated Compute/Storage.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which NocoDB and Snowflake actually diverge.

Attributes where NocoDB and Snowflake differ
AttributeNocoDBSnowflake
Pricing modelopen-sourceUnknown
PlatformsCloud, Self-hosted, DockerWeb, API
CategorySpreadsheet & DataMachine Learning & Data Science
Founded20202012

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in NocoDB

  • REST API
  • GraphQL API
  • No-code database
  • Multiple SQL databases
  • Webhooks
  • Automation
  • Cloud support
  • Self-hosted support

Only in Snowflake

  • Separated Compute/Storage
  • Near-zero Maintenance
  • Data Sharing
  • Time Travel
  • Cloning
  • Multi-cluster Warehouse
  • Semi-structured Data
  • dbt

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

NocoDB

  • Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Snowflake
  • Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot Snowflake
  • Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot Snowflake
  • Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot Snowflake

Snowflake

  • Cloud data warehousing and SQL analyticsnot NocoDB
  • Data engineering and ELT pipelinesnot NocoDB
  • Data sharing and marketplacenot NocoDB
  • AI/ML workloads via Snowpark and Cortexnot NocoDB
  • BI backend for tools such as Tableau and Power BInot NocoDB

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

NocoDB

  • The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
  • Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
  • Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
  • SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
  • The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers

Snowflake

  • No flat subscription price is published - cost varies by edition, cloud provider, and region and requires a separate calculator or credit-consumption table
  • Free trial is capped at $400 in credits or 30 days, whichever comes first, not a perpetual free tier
  • During the trial, certain features (external network access, hybrid tables, Openflow) are capped at 10 credits/day until a payment method is added
  • Total cost combines compute credits, storage, and data transfer billed separately

Pricing, plan by plan

NocoDB

Free
  • CommunityFree
    • Self-hosted NocoDB
    • Community support
  • Starter$5/monthly
    • Cloud hosting
    • Basic features

Snowflake

Free
  • Standard$undefined/mo
    • Consumption-based, per-credit pricing
  • Enterprise$undefined/mo
    • Consumption-based, per-credit pricing
  • Business Critical$undefined/mo
    • Consumption-based, per-credit pricing
  • Virtual Private Snowflake$undefined/mo
    • Consumption-based, per-credit pricing

Which should you pick?

Choose NocoDB if

  • You need rest api.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
  • You also want graphql api.
NocoDB review

Choose Snowflake if

  • You need separated compute/storage.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want near-zero maintenance.
Snowflake review

Questions people ask

Is NocoDB or Snowflake better?
Neither clearly leads. NocoDB starts at Free and Snowflake at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, NocoDB or Snowflake?
NocoDB starts at Free and Snowflake at Free.
Does NocoDB or Snowflake run on more platforms?
NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker. Snowflake runs on Web, API.
Can I use NocoDB for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is NocoDB best used for?
NocoDB is most often used for self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database, putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing postgres or mysql database, building internal tools on structured data with an api, team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiers. Of those, self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database and putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing postgres or mysql database are not what Snowflake is typically brought in for.
What can NocoDB do that Snowflake cannot?
NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases. Snowflake covers Separated Compute/Storage, Near-zero Maintenance, Data Sharing, Time Travel.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on NocoDB

More on Snowflake

Keep looking

Other head to heads