Machine Learning & Data Science · head to head
H2O.ai vs Alteryx

H2O.ai
Machine Learning & Data Science
AI Cloud for building and deploying AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: H2O.ai java is always required to run H2O-3 even when working from R or Python, and only a 64-bit JRE or JDK is supported; Alteryx starter is $250 per user per month billed annually, and the Professional and Enterprise editions are quote-only
- They diverge on capability: H2O.ai covers AutoML, Alteryx covers Data preparation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which H2O.ai and Alteryx actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning & Data Science).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in H2O.ai
- AutoML
- Distributed computing
- Feature engineering
- Model explainability
- Time series forecasting
- Spark
- Hadoop
- JDBC
Only in Alteryx
- Data preparation
- Data blending
- Predictive analytics
- Spatial analytics
- Reporting
- Snowflake
- AWS
- Tableau
Both cover
- Python
- R
- Windows support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
H2O.ai
- Distributed in-memory machine learning over large datasetsnot Alteryx
- Training and productionising models from R or Python against a shared H2O clusternot Alteryx
Alteryx
- Data preparation and building AI-ready datasetsnot H2O.ai
- Predictive analytics without writing codenot H2O.ai
- Automating and orchestrating repeatable analytics workflowsnot H2O.ai
- Enterprise reporting with governed, reusable logicnot H2O.ai
- Connecting to Snowflake, Databricks and cloud warehouses alongside on-premises systemsnot H2O.ai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
H2O.ai
- Java is always required to run H2O-3 even when working from R or Python, and only a 64-bit JRE or JDK is supported
- Supported Java versions stop at Java SE 17; newer versions only run by forcing an unsupported version flag and are guaranteed for experiments rather than production
- H2O-3 only supports numpy below version 2, so a numpy 2 environment must be downgraded
- Supported Python versions are limited to 3.7 through 3.11
- The Flow web UI requires an internet browser and is the only graphical interface
Alteryx
- Starter is $250 per user per month billed annually, and the Professional and Enterprise editions are quote-only
- Automation runs are metered, with 50 included on Starter and 15,000 on Professional, and more must be bought
- Cost depends on three separate dimensions at once: edition, user role and automation capacity
- Advanced analytics, governance and orchestration are withheld from the entry edition
Pricing, plan by plan
H2O.ai
Free- H2O-3 Open SourceFree
- Core algorithms
- AutoML
- Community support
- Driverless AIFree
- Automatic feature engineering
- Model explainability
- Enterprise support
Alteryx
Free- TrialFree
- 14-day trial
- Full features
- Designer Desktop$5195/year
- Data prep
- Blending
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose H2O.ai if
- You need automl.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want distributed computing.
Choose Alteryx if
- You need data preparation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want data blending.
Questions people ask
- Is H2O.ai or Alteryx better?
- Neither clearly leads. H2O.ai starts at Free and Alteryx at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, H2O.ai or Alteryx?
- H2O.ai starts at Free and Alteryx at Free.
- Does H2O.ai or Alteryx run on more platforms?
- H2O.ai runs on Web, Cloud. Alteryx runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use H2O.ai for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is H2O.ai best used for?
- H2O.ai is most often used for distributed in-memory machine learning over large datasets, training and productionising models from r or python against a shared h2o cluster. Of those, distributed in-memory machine learning over large datasets and training and productionising models from r or python against a shared h2o cluster are not what Alteryx is typically brought in for.
- What can H2O.ai do that Alteryx cannot?
- H2O.ai covers AutoML, Distributed computing, Feature engineering, Model explainability. Alteryx covers Data preparation, Data blending, Predictive analytics, Spatial analytics. Both handle Python, R, Windows support, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
H2O.ai: Is H2O open source and free?
Yes. H2O-3 OSS is free and Apache-licensed, designed for self-managed and experimental workflows. H2O.ai also offers enterprise cloud solutions with additional features.
SourceH2O.ai: How many companies use H2O's open source platform?
Over 18,000 companies across Finance, Insurance, Healthcare, Retail, Telco, Sales, and Marketing use H2O's open-source machine learning platform.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- H2O.ai vs AWS SageMaker
- H2O.ai vs Google Vertex AI
- H2O.ai vs Azure Machine Learning
- H2O.ai vs DataRobot
- H2O.ai vs Snowflake
- H2O.ai vs TensorFlow
- H2O.ai vs Comet ML
- H2O.ai vs Keras
- H2O.ai vs MLflow
- H2O.ai vs Jupyter
- H2O.ai vs PyTorch
- H2O.ai vs scikit-learn
- H2O.ai vs Apache Spark MLlib
- H2O.ai vs Weights & Biases
- H2O.ai vs Anaconda
- H2O.ai vs Databricks
- H2O.ai vs Dataiku
- H2O.ai vs DVC
- Alteryx vs AWS SageMaker
- Alteryx vs Google Vertex AI
- Alteryx vs Azure Machine Learning
- Alteryx vs DataRobot
- Alteryx vs Snowflake
- Alteryx vs TensorFlow
- Alteryx vs Comet ML
- Alteryx vs Keras
- Alteryx vs MLflow
- Alteryx vs Jupyter
- Alteryx vs PyTorch
- Alteryx vs scikit-learn
- Alteryx vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Alteryx vs Weights & Biases
- Alteryx vs Anaconda
- Alteryx vs Databricks
- Alteryx vs Dataiku
- Alteryx vs DVC

