Software · head to head
DVC vs Stata
The short version
- Only DVC has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DVC dVC is Apache 2.0 licensed open source with no enterprise tier or paid support offering documented in the project itself; teams needing SLA-backed support get nothing from the DVC project directly.; Stata the entry Stata/BE edition is capped at 2,048 variables and 798 independent variables in a model
- They diverge on capability: DVC covers Data versioning, Stata covers Statistical analysis.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DVC and Stata actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Linux, Mac, Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DVC
- Data versioning
- Pipeline management
- Experiment tracking
- Remote storage
- Git integration
- Git
- S3
- Azure Blob
Only in Stata
- Statistical analysis
- Data management
- Graphics
- Econometrics
- Survey analysis
- Python
- ODBC
- Excel
Both cover
- Linux support
- Mac support
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DVC
- Machine learningnot Stata
- Data analysisnot Stata
- Model trainingnot Stata
- Predictive analyticsnot Stata
Stata
- Statistical analysis and econometrics on panel and survey datanot DVC
- Reproducible research with do files and logsnot DVC
- Teaching quantitative methods to studentsnot DVC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DVC
- DVC is Apache 2.0 licensed open source with no enterprise tier or paid support offering documented in the project itself; teams needing SLA-backed support get nothing from the DVC project directly.
Stata
- The entry Stata/BE edition is capped at 2,048 variables and 798 independent variables in a model
- Raising the variable limit to 32,767 requires Stata/SE and 120,000 requires Stata/MP
- Stata/MP is licensed by core count, so 2 core and 4 core licences are priced separately
- Student licences require proof of enrolment at a degree granting institution
- Stata/MP is not sold on a 6 month student term
- Perpetual student licences cost several times the annual price, for example $298 against $94 for Stata/BE
Pricing, plan by plan
DVC
Free- Open SourceFree
- Data versioning
- Pipeline management
- Experiment tracking
- DVC StudioFree
- Web UI
- Team collaboration
- Visualizations
Stata
$48/year- Stata/BE$48/year
- Basic edition
- Core features
- Stata/SE$295/year
- Standard edition
- Larger datasets
Which should you pick?
Choose DVC if
- You need data versioning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want pipeline management.
Choose Stata if
- You need statistical analysis.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want data management.
Questions people ask
- Is DVC or Stata better?
- Neither clearly leads. DVC starts at Free and Stata at $48/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DVC or Stata?
- DVC has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DVC and $48/year for Stata.
- Does DVC or Stata run on more platforms?
- Both run on Linux, Mac, Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use DVC for free?
- Yes. DVC has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Stata starts at $48/year.
- What is DVC best used for?
- DVC is most often used for machine learning, data analysis, model training, predictive analytics. Of those, machine learning and data analysis are not what Stata is typically brought in for.
- What can DVC do that Stata cannot?
- DVC covers Data versioning, Pipeline management, Experiment tracking, Remote storage. Stata covers Statistical analysis, Data management, Graphics, Econometrics. Both handle Linux support, Mac support, Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- DVC vs AWS SageMaker
- DVC vs Google Vertex AI
- DVC vs Azure Machine Learning
- DVC vs DataRobot
- DVC vs Snowflake
- DVC vs TensorFlow
- DVC vs Comet ML
- DVC vs Keras
- DVC vs MLflow
- DVC vs Jupyter
- DVC vs PyTorch
- DVC vs scikit-learn
- DVC vs Apache Spark MLlib
- DVC vs Weights & Biases
- DVC vs Alteryx
- DVC vs Anaconda
- DVC vs Databricks
- DVC vs Dataiku
- Stata vs AWS SageMaker
- Stata vs Google Vertex AI
- Stata vs Azure Machine Learning
- Stata vs DataRobot
- Stata vs Snowflake
- Stata vs TensorFlow
- Stata vs Comet ML
- Stata vs Keras
- Stata vs MLflow
- Stata vs Jupyter
- Stata vs PyTorch
- Stata vs scikit-learn
- Stata vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Stata vs Weights & Biases
- Stata vs Alteryx
- Stata vs Anaconda
- Stata vs Databricks
- Stata vs Dataiku

