Softwr

Software Development · head to head

Devin vs Baseten

Devin logo

Devin

Software Development

Autonomous AI software engineer planning and executing code in its own environment

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
B

Baseten

Software Development

Inference is everything

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Devin pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales; Baseten gPU compute is billed per minute by hardware class, from $0.01052 per minute on a T4 up to $0.16633 per minute on a B200, so costs vary by which accelerator a workload lands on, as of August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Devin and Baseten actually diverge.

Attributes where Devin and Baseten differ
AttributeDevinBaseten
Pricing modelsubscriptionusage-based
PlatformsDesktop, Windsurf integration, WebWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Software Development).

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Devin

  • Feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebasesnot Baseten
  • Code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositoriesnot Baseten
  • Bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verificationnot Baseten
  • Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept developmentnot Baseten
  • Repetitive implementation tasks freeing human engineers for complex designnot Baseten

Baseten

No use cases recorded yet. See the Baseten review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Devin

  • Pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
  • Cannot handle extremely difficult tasks reliably; success rate decreases with task complexity
  • Requires clear, well-scoped task descriptions; ambiguous requirements reduce effectiveness
  • Requires human oversight and integration into existing workflows; not fully autonomous

Baseten

  • GPU compute is billed per minute by hardware class, from $0.01052 per minute on a T4 up to $0.16633 per minute on a B200, so costs vary by which accelerator a workload lands on, as of August 2026.

Pricing, plan by plan

Devin

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Devin review.

Baseten

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Baseten review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Devin if

  • You work on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web.
Devin review

Choose Baseten if

Nothing in the data separates Baseten from Devin on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Baseten review

Questions people ask

Is Devin or Baseten better?
Neither clearly leads. Devin starts at On request and Baseten at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Devin or Baseten?
Devin starts at On request and Baseten at On request.
Does Devin or Baseten run on more platforms?
Devin runs on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web. Baseten runs on Web.
What is Devin best used for?
Devin is most often used for feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases, code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories, bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verification, rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept development. Of those, feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebases and code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositories are not what Baseten is typically brought in for.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Devin

More on Baseten

Keep looking

Other head to heads