Software · head to head
Compound vs Alchemy
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Compound compound is a decentralized, non-custodial protocol governed by COMP token holders rather than a company; interest rates on supplied and borrowed assets are set algorithmically by pool utilization rather than published as a price list, so there is no vendor pricing page to compare against; Alchemy the free tier is capped at 30M compute units a month and 25 requests per second
- They diverge on capability: Compound covers Lending, Alchemy covers Node APIs.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Compound and Alchemy actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2017).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Compound
- Lending
- Borrowing
- cTokens
- Governance
- COMP Token
- Ethereum
Only in Alchemy
- Node APIs
- Enhanced APIs
- NFT API
- Webhooks
- Mempool
- 35+ chains
- SDKs
- Api support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Compound
- Decentralised finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing protocol on Ethereumnot Alchemy
- Cryptocurrency collateral management for USDC borrowingnot Alchemy
- Interest earning through crypto asset supplynot Alchemy
- Algorithmic interest rate determination based on supply and demandnot Alchemy
Alchemy
- Hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnetsnot Compound
- Backing a production web3 application without running nodesnot Compound
- Webhook-driven notifications for on-chain eventsnot Compound
- Scaling read throughput beyond self-hosted node limitsnot Compound
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Compound
- Compound is a decentralized, non-custodial protocol governed by COMP token holders rather than a company; interest rates on supplied and borrowed assets are set algorithmically by pool utilization rather than published as a price list, so there is no vendor pricing page to compare against
Alchemy
- The free tier is capped at 30M compute units a month and 25 requests per second
- Free accounts are limited to 5 apps and 5 webhooks
- Beyond the free allowance it is $0.45 per 1M compute units for the first 300M a month
- Request cost varies by call complexity, from around 10 compute units to over 100, so spend is hard to predict from request counts alone
- Signed SLAs and priority support require an Enterprise contract
Pricing, plan by plan
Compound
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Compound review.
Alchemy
Free- FreeFree
- 300M compute units
- 5 apps
- Core APIs
- Growth$49/month
- 400M compute units
- 15 apps
- Enhanced APIs
- Scale$199/month
- 1B compute units
- Unlimited apps
- Premium support
Which should you pick?
Choose Compound if
- You need lending.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Ethereum.
- You also want borrowing.
Choose Alchemy if
- You need node apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Api, Web.
- You also want enhanced apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Compound or Alchemy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Compound starts at Free and Alchemy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Compound or Alchemy?
- Compound starts at Free and Alchemy at Free.
- Does Compound or Alchemy run on more platforms?
- Compound runs on Ethereum. Alchemy runs on Api, Web.
- Can I use Compound for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Compound best used for?
- Compound is most often used for decentralised finance (defi) lending and borrowing protocol on ethereum, cryptocurrency collateral management for usdc borrowing, interest earning through crypto asset supply, algorithmic interest rate determination based on supply and demand. Of those, decentralised finance (defi) lending and borrowing protocol on ethereum and cryptocurrency collateral management for usdc borrowing are not what Alchemy is typically brought in for.
- What can Compound do that Alchemy cannot?
- Compound covers Lending, Borrowing, cTokens, Governance. Alchemy covers Node APIs, Enhanced APIs, NFT API, Webhooks. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Compound vs Binance
- Compound vs Bybit
- Compound vs Curve Finance
- Compound vs Gemini
- Compound vs Uniswap
- Compound vs dYdX
- Compound vs Gate.io
- Compound vs PancakeSwap
- Compound vs Aave
- Compound vs CoinGecko
- Compound vs KuCoin
- Compound vs Lido
- Compound vs MakerDAO
- Compound vs OKX
- Compound vs SushiSwap
- Compound vs Argent
- Compound vs Bitfinex
- Alchemy vs Binance
- Alchemy vs Bybit
- Alchemy vs Curve Finance
- Alchemy vs Gemini
- Alchemy vs Uniswap
- Alchemy vs dYdX
- Alchemy vs Gate.io
- Alchemy vs PancakeSwap
- Alchemy vs Aave
- Alchemy vs CoinGecko
- Alchemy vs KuCoin
- Alchemy vs Lido
- Alchemy vs MakerDAO
- Alchemy vs OKX
- Alchemy vs SushiSwap
- Alchemy vs Argent
- Alchemy vs Bitfinex


