Software · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Productive

Productive
Software
Run projects, budgets and resources in one place
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cockroach Labs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Productive essential plan is capped at 5 account-level custom fields and 1 CRM pipeline versus 15 fields and 3 pipelines on Professional
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Productive actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Productive |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Productive
Nothing recorded that Cockroach Labs does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Productive
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Productive
Productive
No use cases recorded yet. See the Productive review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Productive
- Essential plan is capped at 5 account-level custom fields and 1 CRM pipeline versus 15 fields and 3 pipelines on Professional
- Ultimate tier for complex organizations is quote-only, listed as Let's talk with no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Productive
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Productive review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Productive if
Nothing in the data separates Productive from Cockroach Labs on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Productive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Productive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Productive?
- Cockroach Labs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cockroach Labs and On request for Productive.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Productive run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Productive runs on Web.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Yes. Cockroach Labs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Productive starts at On request.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Productive is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Productive cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- Cockroach Labs vs FreshBooks
- Cockroach Labs vs Accelo
- Cockroach Labs vs Certinia PSA
- Cockroach Labs vs Ironclad
- Cockroach Labs vs MyCase
- Cockroach Labs vs PracticePanther
- Cockroach Labs vs TravelPerk
- Productive vs PostgreSQL
- Productive vs Airtable
- Productive vs Amazon Aurora
- Productive vs Elasticsearch
- Productive vs PlanetScale
- Productive vs Azure SQL
- Productive vs ClickHouse
- Productive vs Couchbase
- Productive vs DuckDB
- Productive vs DynamoDB
- Productive vs MariaDB
- Productive vs Oracle Database
- Productive vs Amazon RDS
- Productive vs Amazon Redshift
- Productive vs Apache Druid
- Productive vs Cassandra
- Productive vs CouchDB
- Productive vs Firebolt
- Productive vs FreshBooks
- Productive vs Accelo
- Productive vs Certinia PSA
- Productive vs Ironclad
- Productive vs MyCase
- Productive vs PracticePanther
- Productive vs TravelPerk

