Software · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Deno Deploy
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Deno Deploy smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Deno Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Deno Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Cloud/Web |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
Both cover
- SOC2
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Deno Deploy
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Deno Deploy
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot Cockroach Labs
- Edge functionsnot Cockroach Labs
- Static sitesnot Cockroach Labs
- Real-time appsnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud/Web.
- You also want deno kv.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Deno Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Deno Deploy?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Deno Deploy run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Deno Deploy runs on Cloud/Web.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Deno Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Deno Deploy cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution. Both handle SOC2, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourceDeno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
More on Deno Deploy
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- Cockroach Labs vs Grafana Cloud
- Cockroach Labs vs Neon
- Cockroach Labs vs DigitalOcean
- Cockroach Labs vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Cockroach Labs vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cockroach Labs vs Heroku
- Cockroach Labs vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cockroach Labs vs Linode
- Cockroach Labs vs Packer
- Cockroach Labs vs Pulumi
- Cockroach Labs vs Render
- Cockroach Labs vs Upstash
- Cockroach Labs vs Vagrant
- Cockroach Labs vs Vultr
- Cockroach Labs vs Akamai
- Cockroach Labs vs Alibaba Cloud
- Cockroach Labs vs Chef
- Cockroach Labs vs Contabo
- Deno Deploy vs PostgreSQL
- Deno Deploy vs Airtable
- Deno Deploy vs Amazon Aurora
- Deno Deploy vs Elasticsearch
- Deno Deploy vs PlanetScale
- Deno Deploy vs Azure SQL
- Deno Deploy vs ClickHouse
- Deno Deploy vs Couchbase
- Deno Deploy vs DuckDB
- Deno Deploy vs DynamoDB
- Deno Deploy vs MariaDB
- Deno Deploy vs Oracle Database
- Deno Deploy vs Amazon RDS
- Deno Deploy vs Amazon Redshift
- Deno Deploy vs Apache Druid
- Deno Deploy vs Cassandra
- Deno Deploy vs CouchDB
- Deno Deploy vs Firebolt
- Deno Deploy vs Grafana Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs DigitalOcean
- Deno Deploy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Heroku
- Deno Deploy vs Hetzner Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Linode
- Deno Deploy vs Packer
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Vagrant
- Deno Deploy vs Vultr
- Deno Deploy vs Akamai
- Deno Deploy vs Alibaba Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Chef
- Deno Deploy vs Contabo


