Software · head to head
Arable vs Valley Irrigation
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arable requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription; Valley Irrigation the technology products are tied to Valley irrigation hardware such as center pivots and ICON control panels rather than sold as standalone software
- They diverge on capability: Arable covers Weather monitoring, Valley Irrigation covers Remote monitoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arable and Valley Irrigation actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arable | Valley Irrigation |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 1946 |
Identical on both: starting price ($29/month), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android, Hardware), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arable
- Weather monitoring
- Evapotranspiration
- Chlorophyll index
- Disease risk models
- Growth stage tracking
- Trimble
- GDPR
Only in Valley Irrigation
- Remote monitoring
- Variable rate irrigation
- GPS guidance
- Water management
- Pump control
- Soil sensors
- Encrypted
Both cover
- Climate FieldView
- John Deere
- SSL
- Web support
- Ios support
- Android support
- Hardware support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arable
- In-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensornot Valley Irrigation
- Irrigation scheduling based on measured conditionsnot Valley Irrigation
- Water sustainability reporting for enterprise growersnot Valley Irrigation
- Weather risk management across dispersed fieldsnot Valley Irrigation
Valley Irrigation
- Remotely monitoring and controlling center pivot irrigation machinesnot Arable
- Variable rate irrigation applying different water depths across a fieldnot Arable
- Diagnosing pivot faults and pump status without driving to the fieldnot Arable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arable
- Requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription
- Pricing is not published and goes through a sales conversation
- Aimed at enterprise growers and advisors rather than smallholders
Valley Irrigation
- The technology products are tied to Valley irrigation hardware such as center pivots and ICON control panels rather than sold as standalone software
- No price is published for any product; the site routes buyers to a Get a Quote form and to local dealers
Pricing, plan by plan
Arable
$29/month- Standard$1200/device/year
- Weather data
- Crop stress
- Basic analytics
- Premium$2400/device/year
- Full analytics
- Disease models
- API access
Valley Irrigation
$29/month- BaseStation3$1200/year
- Remote monitoring
- Basic control
- Alerts
- AgSense$2000/year
- Full VRI
- Advanced analytics
- API
Which should you pick?
Choose Arable if
- You need weather monitoring.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want evapotranspiration.
Choose Valley Irrigation if
- You need remote monitoring.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want variable rate irrigation.
Questions people ask
- Is Arable or Valley Irrigation better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arable starts at $29/month and Valley Irrigation at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arable or Valley Irrigation?
- Arable starts at $29/month and Valley Irrigation at $29/month.
- Does Arable or Valley Irrigation run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Arable best used for?
- Arable is most often used for in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor, irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions, water sustainability reporting for enterprise growers, weather risk management across dispersed fields. Of those, in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor and irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions are not what Valley Irrigation is typically brought in for.
- What can Arable do that Valley Irrigation cannot?
- Arable covers Weather monitoring, Evapotranspiration, Chlorophyll index, Disease risk models. Valley Irrigation covers Remote monitoring, Variable rate irrigation, GPS guidance, Water management. Both handle Climate FieldView, John Deere, SSL, Web support.
Related pages
More on Valley Irrigation
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Arable vs CropX
- Arable vs Granular
- Arable vs AgriSync
- Arable vs Bushel
- Arable vs Conservis
- Arable vs FarmLogs
- Arable vs MyJohnDeere
- Arable vs 365FarmNet
- Arable vs Ag-Analytics
- Arable vs Ag Leader
- Arable vs AgCode
- Arable vs Agrivi
- Arable vs AgriWater
- Arable vs AgriWebb
- Arable vs Agronomic
- Arable vs Agworld
- Arable vs Bushel Farm
- Arable vs CattleMax
- Valley Irrigation vs CropX
- Valley Irrigation vs Granular
- Valley Irrigation vs AgriSync
- Valley Irrigation vs Bushel
- Valley Irrigation vs Conservis
- Valley Irrigation vs FarmLogs
- Valley Irrigation vs MyJohnDeere
- Valley Irrigation vs 365FarmNet
- Valley Irrigation vs Ag-Analytics
- Valley Irrigation vs Ag Leader
- Valley Irrigation vs AgCode
- Valley Irrigation vs Agrivi
- Valley Irrigation vs AgriWater
- Valley Irrigation vs AgriWebb
- Valley Irrigation vs Agronomic
- Valley Irrigation vs Agworld
- Valley Irrigation vs Bushel Farm
- Valley Irrigation vs CattleMax


