IoT & Smart Home · head to head
Aqara vs Google Home

Aqara
IoT & Smart Home
Smart home sensors and automation ecosystem
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Google Home
IoT & Smart Home
Google's smart home platform with Google Assistant
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Google Home has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aqara a hub is required for full functionality, and Matter accessories need a Matter controller such as the Hub M3 configured in Aqara Home first; Google Home web version (home.google.com) has limited controls compared to the mobile app
- They diverge on capability: Aqara covers Zigbee protocol, Google Home covers Voice Control.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aqara and Google Home actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aqara | Google Home |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | one-time | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | IOS, Android | iOS, Android, Web, ChromeOS |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (IoT & Smart Home), founded (2016).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aqara
- Zigbee protocol
- Sensor ecosystem
- Automation scenes
- Long battery life
- Local processing
- Apple HomeKit
- Apple HomeKit
- Amazon Alexa
Only in Google Home
- Voice Control
- Routines
- Multi-Room Audio
- 10,000+ devices
- Nest products
- Chromecast
- Third-party apps
- Web support
Both cover
- Google Assistant
- IOS support
- Android support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aqara
- Smart home sensors, switches and cameras on Zigbeenot Google Home
- Automations across HomeKit, Google Home, Alexa and SmartThingsnot Google Home
- Matter-based smart home setupsnot Google Home
- Door locks and curtain controllers tied to routinesnot Google Home
Google Home
- Controlling and automating smart home devicesnot Aqara
- Viewing Nest camera feedsnot Aqara
- Creating automation routinesnot Aqara
- Managing household device settingsnot Aqara
- Voice control via Google Assistantnot Aqara
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aqara
- A hub is required for full functionality, and Matter accessories need a Matter controller such as the Hub M3 configured in Aqara Home first
- Primarily a hardware company, so the app exists to run devices you have bought
- Zigbee devices depend on the hub remaining supported
Google Home
- Web version (home.google.com) has limited controls compared to the mobile app
- Battery-camera live streams on the web app auto-stop after 5 minutes
- Requires compatible Google/Nest or third-party smart-home hardware - it is a control app, not a standalone product
Pricing, plan by plan
Aqara
On request- Door Sensor$15/month
- Zigbee
- Long battery
- Instant alerts
- Motion Sensor$20/month
- Light sensor
- Adjustable sensitivity
- Pet immune
- Hub M2$60/month
- Zigbee hub
- IR control
- HomeKit support
Google Home
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Google Home review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Aqara if
- You need zigbee protocol.
- You work on IOS, Android.
- You also want sensor ecosystem.
Choose Google Home if
- You need voice control.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web, ChromeOS.
- You also want routines.
Questions people ask
- Is Aqara or Google Home better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aqara starts at On request and Google Home at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aqara or Google Home?
- Google Home has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Aqara and Free for Google Home.
- Does Aqara or Google Home run on more platforms?
- Aqara runs on IOS, Android. Google Home runs on iOS, Android, Web, ChromeOS.
- Can I use Google Home for free?
- Yes. Google Home has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Aqara starts at On request.
- What is Aqara best used for?
- Aqara is most often used for smart home sensors, switches and cameras on zigbee, automations across homekit, google home, alexa and smartthings, matter-based smart home setups, door locks and curtain controllers tied to routines. Of those, smart home sensors, switches and cameras on zigbee and automations across homekit, google home, alexa and smartthings are not what Google Home is typically brought in for.
- What can Aqara do that Google Home cannot?
- Aqara covers Zigbee protocol, Sensor ecosystem, Automation scenes, Long battery life. Google Home covers Voice Control, Routines, Multi-Room Audio, 10,000+ devices. Both handle Google Assistant, IOS support, Android support.
Related pages
More on Google Home
Other head to heads
- Aqara vs Amazon Alexa
- Aqara vs Apple HomeKit
- Aqara vs Home Assistant
- Aqara vs Nest
- Aqara vs Control4
- Aqara vs Savant
- Aqara vs Arlo
- Aqara vs August Smart Lock
- Aqara vs Crestron
- Aqara vs ESPHome
- Aqara vs Homey
- Aqara vs Hubitat Elevation
- Aqara vs LIFX
- Aqara vs Matter
- Aqara vs TP-Link Kasa
- Aqara vs Arduino Cloud
- Aqara vs Blynk
- Google Home vs Amazon Alexa
- Google Home vs Apple HomeKit
- Google Home vs Home Assistant
- Google Home vs Nest
- Google Home vs Control4
- Google Home vs Savant
- Google Home vs Arlo
- Google Home vs August Smart Lock
- Google Home vs Crestron
- Google Home vs ESPHome
- Google Home vs Homey
- Google Home vs Hubitat Elevation
- Google Home vs LIFX
- Google Home vs Matter
- Google Home vs TP-Link Kasa
- Google Home vs Arduino Cloud
- Google Home vs Blynk
