Software · head to head
Trigger.dev vs Integromat
Trigger.dev
Software
Build and deploy fully managed AI agents and workflows
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Integromat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Trigger.dev compute is billed per second by machine size, from $0.0000169 per second on the smallest Micro instance up to $0.00068 per second on Large 2x, plus $0.000025 per run invocation, as of August 2026.; Integromat the free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Trigger.dev and Integromat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Trigger.dev | Integromat |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: pricing model (usage-based), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Trigger.dev
Nothing recorded that Integromat does not also cover.
Only in Integromat
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Conditional logic
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Trigger.dev
No use cases recorded yet. See the Trigger.dev review.
Integromat
- Building automated workflows between SaaS applications without codenot Trigger.dev
- Moving and transforming data between tools on a schedule or triggernot Trigger.dev
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Trigger.dev
- Compute is billed per second by machine size, from $0.0000169 per second on the smallest Micro instance up to $0.00068 per second on Large 2x, plus $0.000025 per run invocation, as of August 2026.
Integromat
- The free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- Free is limited to 2 active scenarios, a 5 MB file size and 7 days of execution logs
- Billing is per credit where each module action counts as one, so a scenario with many steps consumes credits far faster than its run count suggests
- Make API access requires a paid plan
- Priority execution and full text log search are Pro features
- Overage protection is Enterprise only, so cheaper plans can run up charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Trigger.dev
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Trigger.dev review.
Integromat
Free- FreeFree
- 1000 operations
- 10 scenarios
- Core$10/month
- 10000 operations
- 100 scenarios
- Pro$25/month
- Unlimited operations
- Unlimited scenarios
Which should you pick?
Choose Trigger.dev if
Nothing in the data separates Trigger.dev from Integromat on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Integromat if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want webhooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Trigger.dev or Integromat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Trigger.dev starts at On request and Integromat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Trigger.dev or Integromat?
- Integromat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Trigger.dev and Free for Integromat.
- Does Trigger.dev or Integromat run on more platforms?
- Trigger.dev runs on Web. Integromat runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Integromat for free?
- Yes. Integromat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Trigger.dev starts at On request.
- What can Trigger.dev do that Integromat cannot?
- Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, Data transformation, Error handling.