Software · head to head
Sourcegraph vs Octopus Deploy
Sourcegraph
Software
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Rated
- -
Octopus Deploy
Software
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams; Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sourcegraph and Octopus Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sourcegraph | Octopus Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Octopus Deploy
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Octopus Deploy
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Octopus Deploy
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Octopus Deploy
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
No use cases recorded yet. See the Octopus Deploy review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Pricing, plan by plan
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Octopus Deploy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Octopus Deploy review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Sourcegraph or Octopus Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year and Octopus Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sourcegraph or Octopus Deploy?
- Octopus Deploy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $16000/year for Sourcegraph and Free for Octopus Deploy.
- Does Sourcegraph or Octopus Deploy run on more platforms?
- Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Octopus Deploy runs on Web.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Yes. Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Sourcegraph best used for?
- Sourcegraph is most often used for large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories, enterprise governance and code ownership tracking, ai-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detection, onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebases. Of those, large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories and enterprise governance and code ownership tracking are not what Octopus Deploy is typically brought in for.