Software · head to head
Sourcegraph vs Deno
Sourcegraph
Software
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Rated
- -
D
Deno
Software
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Deno has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams; Deno the runtime itself is MIT licensed per the project's GitHub repository (denoland/deno LICENSE.md) with no cost, but Deno Deploy's free tier caps at 1 million requests and 15 CPU hours per month, per deno.com/deploy/pricing (Aug 2026)
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sourcegraph and Deno actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sourcegraph | Deno |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Deno
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Deno
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Deno
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Deno
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Deno
Deno
No use cases recorded yet. See the Deno review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Deno
- The runtime itself is MIT licensed per the project's GitHub repository (denoland/deno LICENSE.md) with no cost, but Deno Deploy's free tier caps at 1 million requests and 15 CPU hours per month, per deno.com/deploy/pricing (Aug 2026)
- Deno Deploy Pro at $20 per month charges $2 per additional million requests and $0.05 per additional CPU hour once the included quota is exceeded, per deno.com/deploy/pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Deno
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Deno review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Sourcegraph or Deno better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year and Deno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sourcegraph or Deno?
- Deno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $16000/year for Sourcegraph and Free for Deno.
- Does Sourcegraph or Deno run on more platforms?
- Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Deno runs on Web.
- Can I use Deno for free?
- Yes. Deno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Sourcegraph best used for?
- Sourcegraph is most often used for large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories, enterprise governance and code ownership tracking, ai-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detection, onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebases. Of those, large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories and enterprise governance and code ownership tracking are not what Deno is typically brought in for.