Softwr

Software · head to head

RPMGlobal XPAC vs Imago

RPMGlobal XPAC logo

RPMGlobal XPAC

Software

Production scheduling and planning optimization

From
On request
Rated
-
Imago logo

Imago

Software

Geological database and exploration management

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: RPMGlobal XPAC rPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all; Imago now a Seequent product rather than an independent one, so it sits inside that ecosystem and its own domain no longer resolves
  • They diverge on capability: RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Imago covers Geological database.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which RPMGlobal XPAC and Imago actually diverge.

Attributes where RPMGlobal XPAC and Imago differ
AttributeRPMGlobal XPACImago
PlatformsWindows, WebWindows
Founded19951998

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in RPMGlobal XPAC

  • Production scheduling
  • Resource allocation
  • Constraint optimization
  • Multi-scenario planning
  • Real-time updates
  • MineSched
  • Whittle
  • ERP systems

Only in Imago

  • Geological database
  • Drill hole management
  • Sample tracking
  • Data validation
  • Reporting tools
  • Leapfrog
  • Excel
  • GIS systems

Both cover

  • Vulcan
  • Windows support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

RPMGlobal XPAC

  • Midterm and strategic mine production schedulingnot Imago
  • Building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design datanot Imago
  • Comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operationsnot Imago

Imago

  • Digitising and managing drill core photographynot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Linking core imagery to geological logging datanot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Streaming high-resolution core imagery into Leapfrog modelsnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration teamnot RPMGlobal XPAC
  • Capturing core images in the field with the mobile appnot RPMGlobal XPAC

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

RPMGlobal XPAC

  • RPMGlobal publishes no price, no licence model and no purchase route for XPAC; the software pages carry no cost information at all
  • XPAC is one of roughly 40 separate RPMGlobal products, so scheduling, simulation and asset management are separate purchases
  • Obtaining any pricing requires contacting the vendor through a contact or support form

Imago

  • Now a Seequent product rather than an independent one, so it sits inside that ecosystem and its own domain no longer resolves
  • Capturing images at quality expects the Capture X software driving a camera rig, so it is not purely a software purchase

Pricing, plan by plan

RPMGlobal XPAC

On request
  • XPAC Standard$21000/year
    • Production scheduling
    • Resource optimization
    • Constraint management

Imago

On request
  • Imago Professional$6500/year
    • Database management
    • Drill hole tracking
    • Sample management

Which should you pick?

Choose RPMGlobal XPAC if

  • You need production scheduling.
  • You work on Windows, Web.
  • You also want resource allocation.

Choose Imago if

  • You need geological database.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want drill hole management.

Questions people ask

Is RPMGlobal XPAC or Imago better?
Neither clearly leads. RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and Imago at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, RPMGlobal XPAC or Imago?
RPMGlobal XPAC starts at On request and Imago at On request.
Does RPMGlobal XPAC or Imago run on more platforms?
RPMGlobal XPAC runs on Windows, Web. Imago runs on Windows.
What is RPMGlobal XPAC best used for?
RPMGlobal XPAC is most often used for midterm and strategic mine production scheduling, building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data, comparing scheduling scenarios for open cut and underground operations. Of those, midterm and strategic mine production scheduling and building life of mine schedules from geological and mine design data are not what Imago is typically brought in for.
What can RPMGlobal XPAC do that Imago cannot?
RPMGlobal XPAC covers Production scheduling, Resource allocation, Constraint optimization, Multi-scenario planning. Imago covers Geological database, Drill hole management, Sample tracking, Data validation. Both handle Vulcan, Windows support.

Related pages