Softwr

Software · head to head

Paw vs curl

Paw logo

Paw

Software

Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing

From
$99/one-time
Rated
-
curl logo

curl

Software

Command-line tool for transferring data using URLs with wide protocol support

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only curl has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Paw now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client; curl free and open source under an MIT/X derivate license, with no commercial pricing tier; funded only by voluntary sponsorship
  • They diverge on capability: Paw covers REST Client, curl covers HTTP/HTTPS.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Paw and curl actually diverge.

Attributes where Paw and curl differ
AttributePawcurl
Starting price$99/one-timeFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionopen-source
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsMacOSLinux, MacOS, Windows, Unix, Mobile
Founded20131997

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Paw

  • REST Client
  • Scripting
  • Dynamic Values
  • Slack
  • GitHub
  • Custom extensions

Only in curl

  • HTTP/HTTPS
  • FTP
  • Multiple protocols
  • Universal compatibility
  • Scripting tools
  • Linux support
  • Windows support
  • Unix support

Both cover

  • MacOS support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Paw

  • API Development
  • API Gateway
  • API Testing
  • API Documentation
  • Microservices

curl

  • API Development
  • API Gateway
  • API Testing
  • API Documentation
  • Microservices

Both are used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation, microservices, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Paw

  • Now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client

curl

  • Free and open source under an MIT/X derivate license, with no commercial pricing tier; funded only by voluntary sponsorship

Pricing, plan by plan

Paw

$99/one-time
  • Standard$99/one-time
    • Full REST client
    • Advanced scripting
    • Extensions
  • Annual License$49/yearly
    • All features
    • Updates
    • Priority support

curl

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full curl functionality
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Paw if

  • You need rest client.
  • You work on MacOS.
  • You also want scripting.

Choose curl if

  • You need http/https.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, MacOS, Windows, Unix, Mobile.
  • You also want ftp.

Questions people ask

Is Paw or curl better?
Neither clearly leads. Paw starts at $99/one-time and curl at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Paw or curl?
curl has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $99/one-time for Paw and Free for curl.
Does Paw or curl run on more platforms?
Paw runs on MacOS. curl runs on Linux, MacOS, Windows, Unix, Mobile.
Can I use curl for free?
Yes. curl has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paw starts at $99/one-time.
What is Paw best used for?
Paw is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation.
What can Paw do that curl cannot?
Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack. curl covers HTTP/HTTPS, FTP, Multiple protocols, Universal compatibility. Both handle MacOS support.

Related pages