Project Management · head to head
LiquidPlanner vs Kanbanize
Kanbanize
Project Management
Enterprise Kanban software for agile teams
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LiquidPlanner rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up; Kanbanize no per user price or minimum user count is published, despite the page being headed simple pricing
- They diverge on capability: LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Kanbanize covers Kanban boards.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LiquidPlanner and Kanbanize actually diverge.
| Attribute | LiquidPlanner | Kanbanize |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Project Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LiquidPlanner
- Predictive scheduling
- Resource management
- Time tracking
- Workload management
- Salesforce
Only in Kanbanize
- Kanban boards
- Portfolio Kanban
- Workflow automation
- Timeline
- Azure DevOps
- GitHub
- ISO 27001
- Ios support
Both cover
- Analytics
- Jira
- Slack
- SOC 2
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LiquidPlanner
- Productivitynot Kanbanize
- Collaborationnot Kanbanize
- Task managementnot Kanbanize
- Organizationnot Kanbanize
Kanbanize
- Kanban boards and portfolio management for scaled agile teamsnot LiquidPlanner
- Linking strategy and OKRs to delivery workflowsnot LiquidPlanner
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LiquidPlanner
- Rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up
Kanbanize
- No per user price or minimum user count is published, despite the page being headed simple pricing
- Automation rules are a paid add on on both plans, capped at 300 on Standard
- SSO is a paid add on rather than included at either tier
- File storage is 100 GB on Standard against 1 TB on Enterprise, and API calls are capped on Standard without the limit being stated
- A dedicated cloud instance, IP whitelisting and 24/7 support are Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
LiquidPlanner
On request- Essentials$15/month
- Project management
- Basic scheduling
- Professional$25/month
- Predictive scheduling
- Resource management
- Analytics
Kanbanize
On request- Team$149/month
- 15 users
- Unlimited boards
- Kanban analytics
- EnterpriseFree
- Custom pricing
- SSO
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose LiquidPlanner if
- You need predictive scheduling.
- You also want resource management.
Choose Kanbanize if
- You need kanban boards.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want portfolio kanban.
Questions people ask
- Is LiquidPlanner or Kanbanize better?
- Neither clearly leads. LiquidPlanner starts at On request and Kanbanize at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LiquidPlanner or Kanbanize?
- LiquidPlanner starts at On request and Kanbanize at On request.
- Does LiquidPlanner or Kanbanize run on more platforms?
- LiquidPlanner runs on Web. Kanbanize runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is LiquidPlanner best used for?
- LiquidPlanner is most often used for productivity, collaboration, task management, organization. Of those, productivity and collaboration are not what Kanbanize is typically brought in for.
- What can LiquidPlanner do that Kanbanize cannot?
- LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Resource management, Time tracking, Workload management. Kanbanize covers Kanban boards, Portfolio Kanban, Workflow automation, Timeline. Both handle Analytics, Jira, Slack, SOC 2.