Softwr

Library & Archives · head to head

Koha vs FOLIO

Koha logo

Koha

Library & Archives

The world's first free and open source library system

From
Free
Rated
-
FOLIO logo

FOLIO

Library & Archives

The open source library services platform reimagined

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Koha no official vendor exists; hosting, support and development come only from third-party providers in a community directory that explicitly carries no official status; FOLIO fOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.
  • They diverge on capability: Koha covers Circulation management, FOLIO covers Modular app architecture.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Koha and FOLIO actually diverge.

Attributes where Koha and FOLIO differ
AttributeKohaFOLIO
Founded19992016

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Library & Archives).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Koha

  • Circulation management
  • MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging
  • Acquisitions
  • Serials management
  • Patron management
  • OPAC with faceted search
  • Reports and statistics
  • Z39.50 support

Only in FOLIO

  • Modular app architecture
  • Circulation and check-out
  • Inventory and cataloging
  • Acquisitions and invoicing
  • Electronic resource management
  • User management
  • Agreements and licenses
  • Course reserves

Both cover

  • LDAP
  • SIP2
  • LDAP
  • Role-based access
  • Self-hosted deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Koha

  • Libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing feesnot FOLIO

FOLIO

  • Academic library managementnot Koha
  • Custom library applicationsnot Koha
  • Consortial systemsnot Koha
  • Electronic resource managementnot Koha

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Koha

  • No official vendor exists; hosting, support and development come only from third-party providers in a community directory that explicitly carries no official status

FOLIO

  • FOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.

Pricing, plan by plan

Koha

Free
  • Self-HostedFree
    • Full ILS functionality
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging (MARC21/UNIMARC)
  • Hosted (via partners)$150/month
    • Everything in Self-Hosted
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

FOLIO

Free
  • Community EditionFree
    • Modular app ecosystem
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging
  • Hosted (via EBSCO/Index Data)$undefined/year
    • Everything in Community
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

Which should you pick?

Choose Koha if

  • You need circulation management.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want marc21/unimarc cataloging.

Choose FOLIO if

  • You need modular app architecture.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want circulation and check-out.

Questions people ask

Is Koha or FOLIO better?
Neither clearly leads. Koha starts at Free and FOLIO at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Koha or FOLIO?
Koha starts at Free and FOLIO at Free.
Does Koha or FOLIO run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Koha for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Koha best used for?
Koha is most often used for libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees. Of those, libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees is not what FOLIO is typically brought in for.
What can Koha do that FOLIO cannot?
Koha covers Circulation management, MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, Circulation and check-out, Inventory and cataloging, Acquisitions and invoicing. Both handle LDAP, SIP2, LDAP, Role-based access.

Related pages