Softwr

Software · head to head

FOLIO vs ArchivesSpace

FOLIO logo

FOLIO

Software

The open source library services platform reimagined

From
Free
Rated
-
ArchivesSpace logo

ArchivesSpace

Software

Open source archives information management application

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FOLIO fOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.; ArchivesSpace requires Java 17 or 21 (or Java 11/17 for older versions), adding infrastructure complexity
  • They diverge on capability: FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, ArchivesSpace covers Accession management.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FOLIO and ArchivesSpace actually diverge.

Attributes where FOLIO and ArchivesSpace differ
AttributeFOLIOArchivesSpace
PlatformsWeb, ApiUbuntu Linux, macOS, Windows
Founded20162013

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FOLIO

  • Modular app architecture
  • Circulation and check-out
  • Inventory and cataloging
  • Acquisitions and invoicing
  • Electronic resource management
  • User management
  • Agreements and licenses
  • Course reserves

Only in ArchivesSpace

  • Accession management
  • Resource description
  • Digital object management
  • Agent and subject authorities
  • Location management
  • Assessment module
  • Public user interface
  • EAD/MARCXML export

Both cover

  • LDAP
  • Role-based access
  • Self-hosted deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FOLIO

  • Academic library managementnot ArchivesSpace
  • Custom library applicationsnot ArchivesSpace
  • Consortial systemsnot ArchivesSpace
  • Electronic resource managementnot ArchivesSpace

ArchivesSpace

  • Archives and manuscripts repositories providing web access to collectionsnot FOLIO
  • Institutions managing digital objects alongside traditional archival materialsnot FOLIO
  • Community-supported archival organisations seeking open-source solutionsnot FOLIO

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FOLIO

  • FOLIO is open source with no vendor-run SaaS from the FOLIO project itself; adopters must self-host or contract a third-party hosting partner separately.

ArchivesSpace

  • Requires Java 17 or 21 (or Java 11/17 for older versions), adding infrastructure complexity
  • Mandatory Solr 9 (or 8 for older versions) for all production deployments since v3.2.0
  • Production deployments must use external MySQL 5.x or 8.x; embedded database only for testing
  • Minimum 1 GB RAM required, 2 GB recommended; Docker installation recommended as of v4.0.0 due to complexity

Pricing, plan by plan

FOLIO

Free
  • Community EditionFree
    • Modular app ecosystem
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging
  • Hosted (via EBSCO/Index Data)$undefined/year
    • Everything in Community
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

ArchivesSpace

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the ArchivesSpace review.

Which should you pick?

Choose FOLIO if

  • You need modular app architecture.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want circulation and check-out.

Choose ArchivesSpace if

  • You need accession management.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Ubuntu Linux, macOS, Windows.
  • You also want resource description.

Questions people ask

Is FOLIO or ArchivesSpace better?
Neither clearly leads. FOLIO starts at Free and ArchivesSpace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FOLIO or ArchivesSpace?
FOLIO starts at Free and ArchivesSpace at Free.
Does FOLIO or ArchivesSpace run on more platforms?
FOLIO runs on Web, Api. ArchivesSpace runs on Ubuntu Linux, macOS, Windows.
Can I use FOLIO for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is FOLIO best used for?
FOLIO is most often used for academic library management, custom library applications, consortial systems, electronic resource management. Of those, academic library management and custom library applications are not what ArchivesSpace is typically brought in for.
What can FOLIO do that ArchivesSpace cannot?
FOLIO covers Modular app architecture, Circulation and check-out, Inventory and cataloging, Acquisitions and invoicing. ArchivesSpace covers Accession management, Resource description, Digital object management, Agent and subject authorities. Both handle LDAP, Role-based access, Self-hosted deployment.

Related pages