Softwr

Database & Data Management · head to head

ArangoDB vs Apache Pinot

ArangoDB logo

ArangoDB

Database & Data Management

Multi-model database for graph, document, and search

From
Free
Rated
-
Apache Pinot logo

Apache Pinot

Database & Data Management

Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: ArangoDB the company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself; Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
  • They diverge on capability: ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which ArangoDB and Apache Pinot actually diverge.

Attributes where ArangoDB and Apache Pinot differ
AttributeArangoDBApache Pinot
Pricing modelfreemiumopen-source
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Mac, Docker, WebLinux, Docker, Kubernetes
Founded20141999

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Database & Data Management).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in ArangoDB

  • Multi-model Support
  • AQL Query Language
  • Graph Traversals
  • Full-text Search
  • ACID Transactions
  • SmartGraphs
  • Satellite Collections
  • Foxx Microservices

Only in Apache Pinot

  • Real-time Analytics
  • Column-oriented
  • Distributed Processing
  • SQL Support
  • Pluggable Indexing
  • Star-tree Index
  • Upsert Support
  • Presto

Both cover

  • Kafka
  • Spark
  • Linux support
  • Docker support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

ArangoDB

  • Graph, document and key-value data in one databasenot Apache Pinot
  • Vector and full-text search alongside graph traversalnot Apache Pinot
  • Avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured datanot Apache Pinot
  • Backing AI applications needing both graph context and vectorsnot Apache Pinot

Apache Pinot

  • Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot ArangoDB
  • User-facing dashboards inside a productnot ArangoDB
  • Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot ArangoDB
  • Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot ArangoDB

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

ArangoDB

  • The company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself
  • Neither the community licence terms nor cloud pricing are stated on the main site
  • arangodb.com redirects to arango.ai

Apache Pinot

  • Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
  • Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
  • Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database

Pricing, plan by plan

ArangoDB

Free
  • CommunityFree
    • All data models
    • AQL queries
    • Full-text search
  • ArangoGraph$99/month
    • Managed service
    • Graph analytics
    • Enterprise support

Apache Pinot

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Real-time analytics
    • SQL queries
    • Horizontal scaling

Which should you pick?

Choose ArangoDB if

  • You need multi-model support.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
  • You also want aql query language.

Choose Apache Pinot if

  • You need real-time analytics.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
  • You also want column-oriented.

Questions people ask

Is ArangoDB or Apache Pinot better?
Neither clearly leads. ArangoDB starts at Free and Apache Pinot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, ArangoDB or Apache Pinot?
ArangoDB starts at Free and Apache Pinot at Free.
Does ArangoDB or Apache Pinot run on more platforms?
ArangoDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
Can I use ArangoDB for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is ArangoDB best used for?
ArangoDB is most often used for graph, document and key-value data in one database, vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal, avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured data, backing ai applications needing both graph context and vectors. Of those, graph, document and key-value data in one database and vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal are not what Apache Pinot is typically brought in for.
What can ArangoDB do that Apache Pinot cannot?
ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, AQL Query Language, Graph Traversals, Full-text Search. Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. Both handle Kafka, Spark, Linux support, Docker support.

Related pages